Page citation
2026-08-27 · Board Packet · Page 32
Cached archive copy of a publicly posted LAPS document. This page text was extracted from the latest published cached archive copy for this resource.
Source Details
- Meeting date
- 2026-08-27
- Resource
- Board Packet
- Page
- 32
- Archived on
- 2026-09-22T15:00:27.764855+00:00
- Fetch method
- Direct download
- Checksum
- a8efad68b1b7
- Text extraction
- Native PDF text
- Snapshot
- 2026-09-22T15:01:30.193752+00:00
- Document version
- 2026-08-27_board_packet_v1
Extracted Page Text
View page in cached archive copyGRADING 6XXX Page 1 of 2 PURPOSE The Board of Education establishes this policy to define the District’s philosophy and guiding principles for grading and reporting student achievement. Consistent with the District vision and strategic plan, grades shall serve students, families, and educators as an honest and meaningful communication of learning. PHILOSOPHY OF GRADING The Board believes that a grade should communicate, as accurately as possible, what a student knows and is able to do relative to grade-level standards and course expectations. A student’s academic grade shall reflect demonstrated content knowledge and skills. Schools should support continued learning by preserving meaningful opportunities for students to demonstrate growth and mastery over time. The Board affirms the professional judgment of teachers, who know their content, their standards, and their students best, and asks that this judgment be exercised in service of accuracy, fairness, and student growth. The teacher of each course shall determine the student's grade. The grade assigned by the teacher shall not be changed by the Board or the Superintendent except as provided by law, Board policy and administrative regulation. GUIDING PRINCIPLES Grading and reporting practices throughout the District shall be guided by the following principles: 1. Accuracy and meaning. A grade should be a valid reflection of a student’s learning. Practices that distort the academic meaning of a grade—inflating it or deflating it for reasons unrelated to demonstrated learning—should be avoided. 2. Transparency. Students and families should understand how grades are determined and should receive timely, clear information about academic progress so that they can act on it. Expectations should be communicated at the start of a course or grading period. 3. Consistency within a course or standard. Students enrolled in the same course should be assessed against the same standards and expectations, regardless of section or teacher. Collaboration among educators helps a given grade carry comparable meaning from one classroom to the next. 4. Equity and fairness. A grade should reflect a student’s academic performance and demonstrated learning, rather than circumstances unrelated to learning. Students shall not receive grade penalties or rewards, such as extra credit, for non-academic compliance like bringing supplies. Every student shall have a fair and meaningful opportunity to demonstrate learning. Application Across PK-12 These principles apply uniformly across the District and are implemented in developmentally appropriate ways at each level. The form that grading and reporting take—for example, standards-based reporting in the elementary grades and letter or percentage grades in the secondary grades—may differ, but the underlying commitments to accuracy, transparency, consistency, equity, and support for learning remain constant from Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 12. Los Alamos Public Schools